Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZNKO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 123 Citation: SZNKO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 123
Appeal from: SZNKO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship & Anor (No.2) [2012] FMCA 861
Parties: SZNKO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1646 of 2012
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 25 February 2013
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appellant claimed well-founded fear of persecution on account of his Catholic religion in Bangladesh and membership of Bangladesh Nationalist Party – whether Tribunal was illogical, irrational, capricious and/or unreasonable in finding that appellant had acted fraudulently in supplying a non-genuine document – whether Tribunal was required to consider appellant's claims to fear persecution on cumulative basis
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36(2)(a), s 36(3), s 65, s 65(1), s 91U, s 424A, s 430, s 430(1)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 75 ALD 630 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802; (2001) 194 ALR 244 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32; (2004) 78 ALD 224 SZMDS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 SZNKO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 861 SZOOR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 58; (2012) 202 FCR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate