Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coshott v Coshott [2013] FCA 156 Citation: Coshott v Coshott [2013] FCA 156
Parties: JAMES COSHOTT and LJILJANA COSHOTT v ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT and JOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE; JOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT; JAMES COSHOTT, LJILJANA COSHOTT, ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT and SCHILOTSZKY'S NOMINEE COMPANY PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 1412 of 2009
Judge: BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 25 February 2013
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 25 February 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 3
Counsel for the Applicants: The First Applicant appeared in person for the Applicants
Counsel for the First Respondent: The First Respondent appeared in person
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Johnson
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Sally Nash & Co Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1412 of 2009
BETWEEN: JAMES COSHOTT
First Applicant
LJILJANA COSHOTT
Second Applicant
ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT
First Respondent
JOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE
Second Respondent
JOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT
Cross-Claimant
AND: JAMES COSHOTT
First Cross-Respondent
LJILJANA COSHOTT
Second Cross-Respondent
ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT
Third Cross-Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate