Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Comcare v Martinez [2013] FCA 160 Citation: Comcare v Martinez [2013] FCA 160
Parties: COMCARE v MARIA MARTINEZ
File number: ACD 90 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 6 March 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal on a question of law – application for leave to intervene – discretionary considerations – whether the applicant to intervene will make a useful and different contribution
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 5A, 14, 97 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 9.12
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Alphapharm Pty Ltd v Smithkline Beecham (Australia) Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 250 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell (2002) 7 VR 524 McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd [2002] VSC 73 Re Boyd and Comcare (1991) 23 ALD 392; 14 AAR 30 Re Carolyn Joy Gray and Commonwealth Banking Corporation and Commission of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation of Commonwealth Employees [1989] AATA 149 Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd (2011) 284 ALR 222
Date of hearing: 28 February 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate