Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 9) [2013] FCA 168 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 9) [2013] FCA 168
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ARBN 000 312 685) AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v P. T. GARUDA INDONESIA (ARBN 000 861 165)
File numbers: NSD 534 of 2010 NSD 955 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 14 March 2013
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Discretion to limit use of evidence – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136 – Whether expert evidence testimony outside the pleaded case – Whether expert qualified to assert factual claims
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136
Date of hearing: 4 March 2013
Date of last submissions: 5, 6 March 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: J Halley SC, CG Arnott
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for Air New Zealand: R Smith SC, N Owens
Solicitor for Air New Zealand: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for Garuda: M Leeming SC, T Brennan
Solicitor for Garuda: Norton White
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 534 of 2010
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ARBN 000 312 685)
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 14 MARCH 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate