Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tramanco Pty Ltd v BPW Transpec Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 170 Citation: Tramanco Pty Ltd v BPW Transpec Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 170
Parties: TRAMANCO PTY LTD (ACN 010 101 872) v BPW TRANSPEC PTY LTD (ACN 006 645 272)
File number: QUD 114 of 2009
Judges: DOWSETT J
Date of judgment: 6 March 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – whether successful party should have costs of an issue not ultimately decided – indemnity costs – whether Calderbank letter rejected – whether rejection unreasonable
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 40
Cases cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 cited Facton Ltd v Seo (2011) 91 IPR 135 applied
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Dates of submissions: 5 July 2012, 1 August 2012, 10 August 2012
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant and Cross Respondent: Mr A Franklin SC
Solicitor for the Applicant and Cross Respondent: Bennett & Philp Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent and Cross Applicant: Mr P Collinson SC with Ms S Gatford
Solicitor for the Respondent and Cross Applicant: Madgwicks Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 114 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate