Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Visscher v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 219 Citation: Visscher v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 219
Appeal from: Visscher v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 1247
Parties: TIMOTHY VISSCHER v TEEKAY SHIPPING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ACN 079 641 580
File number: NSD 1929 of 2012
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 7 March 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for security for costs for appeal
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 56 Navigation Act 1912 (Cth), ss 75 and 78
Cases cited: Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited [2012] FCA 992 Mead v Mead [2010] FCA 288 Robertson v Knott Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 796 Skyring v Sweeney [1999] FCA 61 Thomson v STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2011] FCA 254
Date of hearing: 6 March 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr BKB Cross
Solicitor for the Respondent: Norton Rose Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1929 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: TIMOTHY VISSCHER
Appellant
AND: TEEKAY SHIPPING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ACN 079 641 580
Respondent
JUDGE: JACOBSON J DATE OF ORDER: 7 MARCH 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate