Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mudiyanselage v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 266 Citation: Mudiyanselage v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 266
Appeal from: Mudiyanselage v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 887
Parties: SURANGANI DILUPA WEERASINGHA MUDIYANSELAGE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1560 of 2012
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 27 March 2013
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate dismissing application for judicial review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – whether Federal Magistrate erred in construction of certain aspect of public interest criterion – consideration of appropriate construction of criterion.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – ss 5(9), 97 Migration Amendment Regulations 2011 (No 1) (Cth) – regs 1.03, 5(2) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – Schedules 2, 4
Cases cited: Mudiyanselage v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 887 – referred to Singh v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 14 – considered
Date of hearing: 8 March 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 40
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr L Karp
Solicitor for the Appellant: Christopher Levingston & Associates
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M J Smith
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1560 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate