Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQBN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 276 Citation: SZQBN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 276
Appeal from: SZQBN v Minister for Immigration [2011] FMCA 408
Parties: SZQBN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
File number: NSD 1488 of 2012
Judge: COWDROY J
Date of judgment: 2 April 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: application for leave to amend notice of appeal – amendments sought not argued by the appellant in the court below – whether it is in the interests of justice to allow the amendments – whether allowing the amendments would cause prejudice to the respondent – whether the proposed grounds of appeal are reasonably arguable
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 140(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 25(1AA) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 31.02 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 120
Cases cited: Antunovic v Dawson (2010) 30 VR 355 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (ACN 0004 551 473) (2009) 254 ALR 198 Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. v Kavanagh (1892) AC 473 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Dart Industries Inc v DÉcor Corporation Pty Ltd (1989) 15 IPR 403 Hamden v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2013] FCA 3 Li Pei Ye v Crown Ltd [2004] FCAFC 8 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Lu (2010) 189 FCR 525 Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631 Murray v Director General, Health and Community Services and Superintendent, Larundel Psychiatric Hospital (Unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, Eames J, 23 June 1995) NAHI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 NAWZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2004] FCAFC 199 Nguyen v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 66 FCR 239 O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310 Opinion on the Writ of Habeas Corpus (1802) Wilm 77; (1758) 97 ER 29 Reece v Webber (2011) 192 FCR 254 Ruddock v Vadarlis (2001) 110 FCR 491 Suttor v Gundowda Proprietary Limited (1950) 81 CLR 418 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609 SZLHP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 172 FCR 170 SZQBN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FMCA 408 SZQBN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2011) 123 ALD 539 SZQBN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] HCATrans 159 (22 June 2012) Teoh v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 49 FCR 409 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 Wall v R; Ex parte King Won and Wah On (No 1) (1927) 39 CLR 245
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate