Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DP World Sydney Limited v Maritime Union of Australia (No 1) [2013] FCA 278 Citation: DP World Sydney Limited v Maritime Union of Australia (No 1) [2013] FCA 278
Parties: DP WORLD SYDNEY LIMITED v MARITIME UNION OF AUSTRALIA, PAUL MCALEER and PAUL KEATING
File number: NSD 2226 of 2012
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleading – Particulars – Application for further and better particulars – Whether particulars supplied sufficient
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570 Federal Court Rules (Cth) O 15 r 2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 16.44, 16.45
Date of hearing: 28 March 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Y Shariff
Solicitor for the Applicant: Herbert Smith Freehills
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms L Doust
Solicitor for the First Respondent: W. G. McNally Jones Staff
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION NSD 2226 of 2012
BETWEEN: DP WORLD SYDNEY LIMITED
Applicant
AND: MARITIME UNION OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
PAUL MCALEER
Second Respondent
PAUL KEATING
Third Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 28 MARCH 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. There be no order as to costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate