Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia S.R.L. (No 5) [2013] FCA 294 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia S.R.L. (No 5) [2013] FCA 294
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v PRYSMIAN CAVI E SISTEMI ENERGIA S.R.L. (FORMERLY PIRELLI CAVI E SISTEMI ENERGIA S.P.A.), NEXANS SA RCS PARIS 393 525 852 and VISCAS CORPORATION ARBN 133 203 595
File number: SAD 145 of 2009
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 5 April 2013
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – agreed antitrust contraventions – agreed injunction, pecuniary penalty, and order for costs – principles appropriate to order for pecuniary penalty
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 44ZZRP, 51, 88 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 191(3)(a) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 40.02(b) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 4D, 45(2), 45A, 76, 80, 150A
Cases cited: J McPhee & Son (Aust) Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2000) 172 ALR 532 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR 41-076
Date of hearing: 18 March 2013
Place: Adelaide (Videolink to Sydney)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate