Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v KDR Victoria Pty Ltd t/as Yarra Trams [2013] FCA 330 Citation: Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v KDR Victoria Pty Ltd t/as Yarra Trams [2013] FCA 330
Parties: AUSTRALIAN RAIL, TRAM AND BUS INDUSTRY UNION and STEVAN UZELAC v KDR VICTORIA PTY LTD TRADING AS YARRA TRAMS
File number: VID 776 of 2012
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2013
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – interpretation of certified agreement – separate question – whether a provision of the certified agreement requires the employer to conduct a particular form of appeal or inquiry into a dismissal – whether an internal disciplinary policy document was incorporated into the agreement by reference – relevance of custom and practice – prior negotiations – "common understanding" INDUSTRIAL LAW – alternative position– interpretation of the respondent's internal disciplinary policy – whether it obliged the respondent to conduct a particular form of appeal or inquiry – relevance of custom and practice – separate question answered in the negative
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50, 546 Public Transport (Victoria) Enterprise Agreement 1997
Cases cited: City of Wanneroo v Holmes [1989] 30 IR 362 Commissioner of Taxation and Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55; (2012) 293 ALR 257 Printing & Kindred Industries Union v Davies Bros Ltd [1986] 18 IR 444 Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association v Woolworths Ltd (2006) 151 FCR 513
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate