Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Yap v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCA 334 Citation: Yap v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCA 334
Parties: YAP CHENG SEE, ARCOLA PTY LTD and WESTPOINT HOLDINGS PTY LTD v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION, ESANDA FINANCE LTD, ANZ BANK, WESTPAC BANK, BANK OF SINGAPORE, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, CURTIN UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, GRANICH & ASSOCIATES, BAILIFF (WA), REGISTRAR OF TITLES and REGISTRAR OF TITLES
File number: WAD 86 of 2013
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 11 April 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to issue a proceeding – whether proceeding would not be an abuse of process – whether there is prima facie ground for the proceeding
Legislation: Corporations Law s 574 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 21 r 1(b), O 21 r 2, O 21 r 5(1), O 21 r 5(2)
Cases cited: Cheng See Yap v Cheshire Holdings Pty Ltd [2007] WASCA 50 Cheshire Holdings Pty Ltd v Yap Cheng See (unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Steytler J, 22 November 1995) Chong v Cheshire Securities Pty Ltd [2001] WASC 266 Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Yap Cheng See (unreported, District Court of Western Australia, Deputy Registrar Harman, 6 December 1994) Granich & Associates v Yap [2004] FCA 1567 Re Attorney-General (Cth); Ex parte Skyring (1996) 135 ALR 129 Re Cheshire Securities Pty Ltd; Ex Parte Chong [2003] WASC 132 Re Yap Cheng See; Cheshire Holdings Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Sanderson M, 11 July 1997) See v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (unreported, Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, Murray and Templeman JJ, 10 September 1998) See v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (unreported, Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, Kennedy, Franklyn and Ipp JJ, 9 April 1998) See v Granich and Associates [2008] FMCA 27 Yap Cheng See v Challenge Bank Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Parker J, 12 December 1997) Yap Cheng See v Cheshire Holdings Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Kennedy, Franklyn and Ipp JJ, 9 April 1998) Yap Cheng See v Commonwealth Bank (District Court of Western Australia, Gunning DCJ, 7 October 1996) Yap Cheng See v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (unreported, District Court of Western Australia, Principal Registrar Harding, 8 November 1995) Yap v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2000] WASC 159 Yap v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2008] FCA 534 Yap v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2009] FCA 831 Yap v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2009] FCA 1159 Yap v Granich & Associates [2005] FCA 309 Yap v Granich Partners [2008] FCA 1380
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate