Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fazio v Verge [2013] FCA 335 Citation: Fazio v Verge [2013] FCA 335
Parties: ARTURO SALVATORE FAZIO v EVAN ROBERT VERGE AND GEORGE AUBREY LOPEZ
File number: WAD 47 of 2013
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 11 April 2013
Date of hearing: 4 April 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms K Levy
Solicitor for the Respondents: Kott Gunning Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 47 of 2013
BETWEEN: ARTURO SALVATORE FAZIO
Appellant
AND: EVAN ROBERT VERGE AND GEORGE AUBREY LOPEZ
Respondents
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 11 APRIL 2013 WHERE MADE: PERTH
UPON THE APPELLANT AND RESPONDENTS EACH UNDERTAKING TO THE COURT THAT EACH WILL, UNTIL FURTHER ORDER, NOT TAKE ANY STEPS TO SELL 10 HANNAH PLACE, LEEMING (THE PREMISES), THE COURT BY CONSENT ORDERS:
1. The matters in issue before the parties in appeal number WAD 47 of 2013 be mediated before Justice Gilmour on a date not before 22 May 2013. 2. Any mediation fee is waived. 3. The solicitors for the respondents, communicate by facsimile transmissions to the appellant (on fax number 08 9332 6630), any offers of settlement, by 21 days prior to the date fixed for mediation. 4. Correspondence and communications between the parties be conducted between the appellant and Kott Gunning, solicitors for the respondents. 5. The appellant be permitted, immediately, to take possession of the Premises, subject to the following conditions: a. immediately upon the conclusion of the mediation, the appellant is to vacate the Premises; and b. the parties have liberty to apply before Justice Gilmour in relation to Order 5(a), prior to the conclusion of the mediation. THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 6. This matter is adjourned to a date to be fixed with each party to have liberty to apply to reinstate the stay application, filed 27 March 2013. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate