Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bupa Australia Pty Ltd v iSelect Limited [2013] FCA 339 Citation: Bupa Australia Pty Ltd v iSelect Limited [2013] FCA 339
Parties: BUPA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 000 057 590) v ISELECT LIMITED (ACN 124 302 932), ISELECT HEALTH PTY LTD (ACN 088 749 955), DAMIEN MICHAEL TREVOR WALLER and MATTHEW ROSS MCCANN; ISELECT LIMITED (ACN 124 302 932) and ISELECT HEALTH PTY LTD (ACN 088 749 955) v BUPA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 000 057 590) and RICHARD BOWDEN
File number: VID 221 of 2012
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2013
Cases cited: Ashby v Commonwealth of Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1411
Date of hearing: 8 March 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S R Senathirajah
Solicitor for the Applicant: King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Star
Solicitor for the Respondents: K & L Gates
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 221 of 2012
BETWEEN: BUPA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 000 057 590)
Applicant
AND: ISELECT LIMITED (ACN 124 302 932)
First Respondent
ISELECT HEALTH PTY LTD (ACN 088 749 955)
Second Respondent
DAMIEN MICHAEL TREVOR WALLER
Third Respondent
MATTHEW ROSS MCCANN
Fourth Respondent
AND BETWEEN: ISELECT LIMITED (ACN 124 302 932)
Cross-Claimant
ISELECT HEALTH PTY LTD (ACN 088 749 955)
Cross-Claimant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate