Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2013] FCA 358 Citation: Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2013] FCA 358
Parties: KEVIN VINCENT DENLAY v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION HELENA MIRJA DENLAY v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number(s): QUD 114 of 2012 QUD 115 of 2012
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 10 April 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs pursuant to s 43 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – where earlier judgment delivered quashing the decision of the respondent to issue a garnishee notice to each of the applicants under s 260-5 of Sch 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – application of judicial discretion to award indemnity costs – whether a sufficient special or unusual feature in the case justifying the awarding of indemnity costs – where respondent had issued a s 260-5 notices in 'abject ignorance' of the basis of a stay of enforcement of judgment of the Supreme Court of Queensland in respect of assessment debts, and the provenance of that order – where notices were issued by the respondent without regard to the merits of the part heard taxation appeals in respect of same assessments – where the applicants' solicitor had written to the respondent after the decision to issue the notices and before instituting proceedings highlighting the existence of the stay order and inviting reconsideration Held: costs to be paid on an indemnity basis
Legislation: Constitution (Cth) Ch III Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 260-5 Transfer Land Act 1958 (Vic) s 42
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate