Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BZADH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 376 Citation: BZADH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 376
Parties: BZADH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 793 of 2012
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 14 March 2013
Date of hearing: 14 March 2013
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Gemma E O'Connor of Clayton Utz
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 793 of 2012
BETWEEN: BZADH
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J DATE OF ORDER: 14 MARCH 2013 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application filed 24 December 2012 is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondents costs of and incidental to the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 793 of 2012
BETWEEN: BZADH
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J DATE: 14 MARCH 2013 PLACE: BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate