Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gao v Citywide Service Solutions Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 388 Citation: Gao v Citywide Service Solutions Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 388
Parties: PENG GAO v CITYWIDE SERVICE SOLUTIONS PTY LTD, FAIR WORK OMBUDSMAN and COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN
File number: VID 71 of 2013
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 26 April 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discontinuance of proceeding against second respondent against whom applicant did not seek to proceed – relief sought against second respondent unable to be granted by the Court even in the event of successful application – no purpose served by matter proceeding to trial – proceeding against second respondent brought vexatiously
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 44(1), 340, 535, 536, 772
Date of hearing: 5 April 2013 and 26 April 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent (on 5 April 2013): Mr J Snaden
Solicitor for the First Respondent (on 5 April 2013): AI Legal Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Second Respondent (on 5 April 2013): Ms M Richards
Solicitor for the Second Respondent (on 5 April 2013): Minter Ellison Lawyers
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Submitting appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate