Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alstom Limited v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (No 3) [2013] FCA 399 Citation: Alstom Limited v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (No 3) [2013] FCA 399
Parties: ALSTOM LIMITED (ABN 15 000 038 237) v LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (ARBN 086 083 605); ALLIANZ AUSTRALIA INSURANCE LIMITED (ABN 15 000 122 850), ACE INSURANCE LIMITED (ABN 23 001 642 020), CATLIN SYNDICATE LIMITED and TOKIO MARINE EUROPE
File number: WAD 300 of 2008
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2013
Corrigendum: 3 May 2013
Date of hearing: 4 April 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Hopwood
Solicitor for the Applicant: Cocks Macnish
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr G Hancy
Solicitor for the Respondents: Blackstone Waterhouse Lawyers
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alstom Limited v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (No 3) [2013] FCA 399 CORRIGENDUM 1. On page 2 of the orders of the Reasons for Judgment, Order 4 should read: 4. Pending final orders, the Court orders that the sum of $2,281,107.53 (being the total of the amount allowed $2,293,865.43 less the deductible applicable under the policy EUR10,000) together with interest thereon pursuant to s 51A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) of $975,266.00 (principal and interest together being "the sum" referred to below) be paid to the applicant by the respondents as follows: a) the first respondent as to 35% of the sum, namely $1,139,730.71; b) the second respondent as to 35% of the sum, namely $1,139,730.71; c) the third respondent as to 10% of the sum, namely $325,637.37; d) the fourth respondent as to 10% of the sum, namely $325,637.37; and e) the fifth respondent as to 10% of the sum, namely $325,637.37. 2. In paragraph 4 of the Reasons for Judgment, the last sentence should read: The respondents will, in the meanwhile, pay the sum of $2,281,107.53 and interest thereon, consequent upon the findings made in the reasons for judgment. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Siopis.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate