Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Schütz Australia Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 19) [2013] FCA 408 Citation: Schütz Australia Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 19) [2013] FCA 408
Parties: SCHÜTZ GMBH & CO KGAA, PROTECHNA S.A. and SCHÜTZ AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 009 069 907) v VIP PLASTIC PACKAGING PTY LTD (ACN 095 313 705) and VIP STEEL PACKAGING PTY LTD (ACN 095 314 195)
File number: WAD 136 of 2009
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 3 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to rely on evidence filed out of time – extensions previously granted – whether in the interests of justice – nature and complexity of evidence – whether evidence is confined to reply – whether respondents prejudiced
Legislation Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 1.32
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Black & Decker (Australasia) Pty Ltd v GMCA Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1623 State of Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146
Date of hearing: 2 April 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 42
Counsel for the Applicants/Cross-Respondents: Mr ML Bennett
Solicitor for the Applicants/Cross-Respondents: Bennett + Co
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate