Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Henderson v McSharer [2013] FCA 414 Citation: Henderson v McSharer [2013] FCA 414
Parties: SUSAN JANE HENDERSON and KIM HENDERSON v WILLIAM BERNARD MCSHARER, HAILEY MARIE MCSHARER and ASTRAEA GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 152 730 526)
File number: WAD 176 of 2012
Judges: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out paragraphs of statement of claim – whether statement of claim defective in certain respects – application for proceeding to be referred to mediation and other programming orders – whether orders sought are conducive to efficient resolution of proceeding
Legislation: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 4.12(1), R 16.02(1)(b), R 16.02(1)(c), R 16.02(1)(d), R 16.02(1)(e), R 16.02(3)
Cases cited: Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 164 CLR 662 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 Brenner v First Artists' Management Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 221 Bryson v Bryant (1992) 29 NSWLR 188 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Hoyt's Proprietary Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 68; (2001) 208 CLR 516
Date of hearing: 26 April 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate