Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Agius v State of South Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 417 Citation: Agius v State of South Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 417
Parties: GARTH AGIUS & OTHERS v STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
File number: SAD 6001 of 2000
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2013
Date of hearing: 8 October 2012
Date of last submissions: 8 November 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: T Campbell
Solicitor for the Applicant: Campbell Law
Counsel for the State of South Australia: A Jantke
Solicitor for the State of South Australia: Crown Solicitor
Counsel for Mr Millison and Ms Millison: Mr Millison and Ms Millison appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 6001 of 2000
BETWEEN: GARTH AGIUS & OTHERS
Applicant
AND: STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 10 MAY 2013 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Milan Millison and Linda Millison be removed as parties to this application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 6001 of 2000
BETWEEN: GARTH AGIUS & OTHERS
Applicant
AND: STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate