Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ambrose (Trustee) in the matter of Poumako (Bankrupt) v Poumako (No 4) [2013] FCA 418 Citation: Ambrose (Trustee) in the matter of Poumako (Bankrupt) v Poumako (No 4) [2013] FCA 418
Parties: COLIN LOUIS AMBROSE AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ROBIN BRIAN POUMAKO v ROBIN BRIAN POUMAKO, JACQUELINE STELLA POUMAKO, TUHI AGNES CASSIDY and JANICE HEATHER POUMAKO
File number: SAD 322 of 2011
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – legal practitioner – whether legal practitioner should be ordered to pay costs – costs thrown away by reason of adjournment of hearing – whether legal practitioner engaged in misconduct for the purposes of r 40.07(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – if so, whether costs thrown away were incurred because of the misconduct – costs order made against legal practitioner
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.07 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 69 r 9
Cases cited: Ambrose (Trustee) in the matter of Poumako (Bankrupt) v Poumako (No 3) [2013] FCA 22 cited Ambrose (Trustee) in the matter of Poumako (Bankrupt) v Poumako [2012] FCA 889 cited Ambrose v Poumako [2012] FCA 318 cited Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 cited Caboolture Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (in liq) v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (1993) 45 FCR 224 cited Re Bendeich (No 2) (1994) 126 ALR 643 cited Macteldir Pty Ltd v Roskov [2007] FCAFC 49 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate