Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pei Xu v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2013] FCA 419 Citation: Pei Xu v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2013] FCA 419
Parties: PEI XU v WAN ZE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION); KE QIN REN v WAN ZE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 131 642 147
File numbers: NSD 1339 of 2012 NSD 1341 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 14 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – non-compliance with Federal Court Bankruptcy Rules – no substantial injustice – application to intervene to bring funds under control of the Court – order that applicants in the substantive proceedings provide affidavits and produce documents as to circumstances of loan
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 41(6A), 306(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51 Federal Court Bankruptcy Rules 2005 (Cth) r 1.03
Cases cited: Sockhill v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 178 ALR 113
Date of hearing: 6, 14 May 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr MR Ellicott
Solicitor for the Applicants: James Lee Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr DC Eardley
Solicitor for the Respondent: Downeys Lawyers Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Interveners: Mr DA Smallbone
Solicitor for the Interveners: Austin Haworth Lexon Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1339 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate