Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rambal v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCA 420 Citation: Rambal v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCA 420
Parties: SAROJNI RAMBAL v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION; VIKAS RAMBAL AS THE TRUSTEE FOR THE VIKAS RAMBAL FAMILY TRUST v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File numbers: NSD 1489 of 2012 NSD 1490 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2013
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – discovery of documents referable to specific paragraphs of affidavit filed on behalf of applicants
Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 264 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 20.14(1)
Date of hearing: 6 May 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr CG Catt
Solicitor for the Applicant: Lavan Legal
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Ms M Hirschhorn
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Maddocks Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1489 of 2012
BETWEEN: SAROJNI RAMBAL
Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 6 MAY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1490 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate