Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology [2013] FCA 451 Citation: National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology [2013] FCA 451
Parties: NATIONAL TERTIARY EDUCATION UNION and JUDITH CAROLYN BESSANT v ROYAL MELBOURNE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
File number: VID 684 of 2012
Judge: GRAY J
Date of judgment: 16 May 2013
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS – employment – adverse action – whether dismissal for redundancy due to exercise of workplace rights – whether employer satisfied onus of proving that reasons alleged were not reasons for dismissal – person advanced as sole decision-maker did not give express evidence that alleged reasons were not taken into account – whether evidence as to reasons advanced exclusive of reliance on other reasons – whether circumstances suggested other reasons relied on – whether other persons also decision-makers – memorandum recommending redundancy had to be approved by two other persons before final decision made INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS – enterprise agreement – breach – redundancy provisions – whether employer obliged to offer voluntary redeployment
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50, Part 3-1 340, 340(1), 340(1)(a), 340(1)(a)(ii), 341, 342(1), 342(1) item 1(a), 360, 361, 361(1), 539(1), 539(2) item 4, item 11, 545, 545(1), 545(2)(b), 545(2)(c), 546, 546(2)(b), 546(3)(b), 547(2), 570(1), 570(2) Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 21(1), 51A(1) Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Act 1992 (Vic)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate