Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth of Australia v Lee [2013] FCA 461 Citation: Commonwealth of Australia v Lee [2013] FCA 461
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal from: Lee v Napier [2013] FCA 236
Parties: THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v DR IL SONG LEE THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v DR IL SONG LEE, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW COMMITTEE NO 525, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF MEDICARE AUSTRALIA, THE DETERMINING AUTHORITY ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 106Q OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE ACT 1973 (CTH) and THE DIRECTOR OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW (COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA)
File numbers: NSD 565 of 2013 NSD 566 of 2013
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 7 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for leave to appeal from Federal Court of Australia – Whether basis for leave to appeal satisfied PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – Appeal – Whether respondent should bear own costs
Legislation: Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) s 84
Cases cited: Lee v Napier [2013] FCA 236
Date of hearing: 7 May 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicant: T Howe QC, T Begbie
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: M Robinson SC
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 565 of 2013
BETWEEN: THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant
AND: DR IL SONG LEE
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 7 MAY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate