Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gonzalez v Gutierrez-Perez (No. 2) [2013] FCA 464 Citation: Gonzalez v Gutierrez-Perez (No. 2) [2013] FCA 464
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Gonzalez v Gutierrez-Perez [2013] FCA 386
Parties: CARLOS DANIEL GONZALEZ v MARTHA LUCIA GUTIERREZ-PEREZ
File number: NSD 751 of 2013
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for leave to appeal from a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia – Whether jurisdiction to grant leave
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 25
Cases cited: Gonzalez v Gutierrez-Perez (2013) FCA 386
Date of hearing: 8 May 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 751 of 2013
BETWEEN: CARLOS DANIEL GONZALEZ
Applicant
AND: MARTHA LUCIA GUTIERREZ-PEREZ
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 8 MAY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 751 of 2013
BETWEEN: CARLOS DANIEL GONZALEZ
Applicant
AND: MARTHA LUCIA GUTIERREZ-PEREZ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate