Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kedem v Johnson Lawyers Legal Practice Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 472 Citation: Kedem v Johnson Lawyers Legal Practice Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 472
Appeal from: Kedem v Johnson Lawyers Legal Practice P/L [2012] FMCA 1118
Parties: EINAV KEDEM v JOHNSON LAWYERS LEGAL PRACTICE PTY LTD
File number: SAD 329 of 2012
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 14 May 2013
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 27
Cases cited: Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (2013) 296 ALR 465; [2013] FCAFC 29 Totev v Sfar (2008) 167 FCR 193
Date of hearing: 14 May 2013
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J James
Solicitor for the Respondent: Johnson Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 329 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: EINAV KEDEM
Appellant
AND: JOHNSON LAWYERS LEGAL PRACTICE PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: KATZMANN J DATE OF ORDER: 14 MAY 2013 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. the appeal be stood over for hearing at 2.15 pm on Wednesday 22 May 2013. 2. the question of costs be reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 329 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate