Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Groves, in the matter of Groves (Bankrupt) v Robinson (Trustee) [2013] FCA 490 Citation: Groves, in the matter of Groves (Bankrupt) v Robinson (Trustee) [2013] FCA 490
Parties: EDMUND STUART GROVES v MARK JULIAN ROBINSON AND ANDREW JOHN SCOTT AS TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF EDMUND STUART GROVES (A BANKRUPT)
File number: QUD 213 of 2013
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 13 May 2013
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application for review of a decision by the trustees of the applicant (a bankrupt) pursuant to s 178 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to refuse to grant the applicant's request to travel overseas – request by applicant to live permanently in Canada to help wife establish an English language college in Vancouver – where two reviewable decisions had been made by trustees: in the first instance, a decision deferring their determination until the applicant's return to Australia, and subsequently, decision which rejected his request – where travel request and the trustee's decisions were made whilst the applicant was outside Australia, although applicant returned to Australia to attend hearing of application – whether discretionary factors identified in Re Tyndall (1977) 30 FLR 6 are satisfied Held: the trustee's decisions are set aside; trustees are directed to consent to the applicant leaving Australia subject to a number of conditions
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 77, 139ZU, 272 Companies Code s 573
Cases cited: Australian Securities Commission v Christopher Charles Skase (unreported, Pincus J, 30 May 1991) considered Re Molina ex parte Wily [1995] FCA 1057 considered Re Tyndall (1977) 30 FLR 6 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate