Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maytom v Prentice (No 2) [2013] FCA 502 Citation: Maytom v Prentice (No 2) [2013] FCA 502
Parties: GARY ALLAN MAYTOM v MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE OF BPS RECOVERY, CRAIG PRYOR OF WARREN MCKEON DICKESON SOLICITORS PTY LTD and JACKSON LALIC SOLICITORS
File number: NSD 547 of 2013
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 21 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 1.39
Date of hearing: 21 May 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Solicitor for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr A Combe
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sally Nash & Co Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 547 of 2013
BETWEEN: GARY ALLAN MAYTOM
Applicant
AND: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE OF BPS RECOVERY
First Respondent
CRAIG PRYOR OF WARREN MCKEON DICKESON SOLICITORS PTY LTD
Second Respondent
JACKSON LALIC SOLICITORS
Third Respondent
JUDGE: JACOBSON J DATE OF ORDER: 21 MAY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Applicant's application for an extension of time in which to file and serve a Notice of Appeal be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 547 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate