Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harcourts WA Pty Ltd v Roy Weston Nominees Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 520 Citation: Harcourts WA Pty Ltd v Roy Weston Nominees Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 520
Parties: HARCOURTS WA PTY LTD v ROY WESTON NOMINEES PTY LTD
File number: SAD 224 of 2012
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2013
Cases cited: Tepko Pty Limited v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1
Date of hearing: 28 March 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr T Duggan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Minter Ellison Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Musgrave
Solicitor for the Respondent: Elevation Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 224 of 2012
BETWEEN: HARCOURTS WA PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: ROY WESTON NOMINEES PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 28 MARCH 2013 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. This matter be adjourned to 19 July 2013 at 9.30 am. 2. The respondent's oral application for the trial of a preliminary issue is dismissed. 3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the respondent's application heard on 28 March 2013. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 224 of 2012
BETWEEN: HARCOURTS WA PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: ROY WESTON NOMINEES PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE: 28 MARCH 2013 PLACE: PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate