Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 12) [2013] FCA 533 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 12) [2013] FCA 533
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ARBN 000 312 685) AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v P. T. GARUDA INDONESIA LIMITED (ARBN 000 861 165)
File numbers: NSD 534 of 2010 NSD 955 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 30 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Suppression order – Application by third party for orders under s 37AG of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – Whether documents sufficiently commercially sensitive and current – Whether order should be made
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AG
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 4) [2012] FCA 1439 cited
Date of hearing: 18 April 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: General
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: J Halley SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for Air New Zealand: R Smith SC, N Owens, R Yezerski
Solicitor for Air New Zealand: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for Garuda: M Leeming SC, T Brennan
Solicitor for Garuda: Norton White
Solicitor for Singpore: K Watts of Minter Ellison
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate