Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Esposito v The Commonwealth [2013] FCA 546 Citation: Esposito v The Commonwealth [2013] FCA 546
Parties: JUNE YVONNE ESPOSITO, MARGARET-ANNE HUTTON, DANIEL WALTER MASSAIOLI, SAM DE MARIA and BRIAN GEORGE EDWARD SMITH v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES, SHOALHAVEN CITY COUNCIL and FOUNDATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE
File number: NSD 924 of 2013
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Part IVA proceedings - whether to grant interlocutory injunction – whether serious question to be tried on acquisition of property on unjust terms (s 51(xxxi) of the Constitution or s 519 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Protection Act 2004 (Cth) ('EPBC Act'), unjust enrichment or false or misleading representations – whether acquisition of property required to be compulsory to offend Constitutional guarantee or to obtain s 519 EPBC Act relief – balance of convenience
Legislation: Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) s 11 Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 2004 (Cth) ss 18, 18A, 26, 27A, 87, 130 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt IVA Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B
Cases cited: Bank of NSW v The Commonwealth (1948) 76 CLR 1 British Medical Association v The Commonwealth (1949) 79 CLR 201 Castlemaine Tooheys Limited v The State of South Australia (1996) 161 CLR 148 ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 240 CLR 140 J T International SA v Commonwealth (2012) 86 ALJR 1297 Newcrest Mining (WA) Ltd v The Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 513 P J Magennis Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1949) 80 CLR 382 The Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1 Waterhouse v Minister for the Arts and Territories (1993) 43 FCR 175
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate