Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
A on behalf of B v State of NSW (Department of Education and Training) (No 2) [2013] FCA 551 Citation: A on behalf of B v State of NSW (Department of Education and Training) (No 2) [2013] FCA 551
Parties: A ON BEHALF OF B v STATE OF NSW (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND COMMUNITIES)
File numbers: NSD 947 of 2011 ; NSD 689 of 2012
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 30 May 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application by litigation representative for approval of settlement – consideration of relevant requirements
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 5, 6, 11, 15, 22, 23 29A and 32 Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 9.70, 9.71
Cases cited: Bannister v State of Victoria [2012] FCA 1341 Smith v Marriott Support Services [2013] FCA 312 Hickey v Public Advocate (Victoria) [2012] FCA 1203 Wade v State of Victoria (No 2) [2012] FCA 1080
Date of hearing: 30 May 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P French
Solicitor for the Applicant: NSW Disability Discrimination Legal Centre
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms K Nomchong SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Hicksons Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 947 of 2011; NSD 689 of 2012
BETWEEN: A ON BEHALF OF B
Applicant
AND: STATE OF NSW (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND COMMUNITIES)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate