Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 5) [2013] FCA 560 Citation: Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 5) [2013] FCA 560
Parties: APOTEX PTY LTD v ASTRAZENECA AB and ASTRAZENECA PTY LIMITED WATSON PHARMA PTY LTD v ASTRAZENECA AB and ASTRAZENECA PTY LIMITED ASTRAZENECA AB and ASTRAZENECA PTY LIMITED v ASCENT PHARMA PTY LTD ACN 118 734 795
File number(s): NSD 673 of 2011 NSD 2342 of 2011 NSD 208 of 2012
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 11 June 2013
Catchwords: PATENTS – costs – further orders of invalidity
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 4) [2013] FCA 162 Bradken Resources v Lynx Engineering Consultants (No. 2) [2012] FCA 1478 Doric Products v Lockwood Security (2002) 54 IPR 495; [2002] FCA 282
In NSD 673 of 2011:
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A J Maryniak
Solicitor for the Applicant: Herbert Smith Freehills
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Kell
Solicitor for the Respondents: Ashurst Australia
In NSD 2342 of 2011:
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A J Ryan SC and Mr I P Horak
Solicitor for the Applicant: King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Kell
Solicitor for the Respondents: Ashurst Australia
In NSD 208 of 2012:
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr D Kell
Solicitor for the Applicants: Ashurst Australia
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A J Ryan SC and Mr I P Horak
Solicitor for the Respondent: King & Wood Mallesons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 673 of 2011
BETWEEN: APOTEX PTY LTD
Applicant/Cross Respondent
AND: ASTRAZENECA AB
First Respondent/Cross Claimants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate