Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pepe's Ducks Ltd [2013] FCA 570 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pepe's Ducks Ltd [2013] FCA 570
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v PEPE'S DUCKS LTD (ACN 001 531 497)
File number: VID 470 of 2012
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 14 June 2013
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – Misleading and deceptive conduct – False and misleading representations as to standard and quality of duck meat products offered for sale – Imposition of pecuniary penalty – discussion of guiding principles relevant to the imposition of a penalty pursuant to s 224 of the Australian Consumer Law – Agreed penalty – Relevant considerations in determining whether agreed penalty is appropriate – Declarations – Injunctions – Corrective notices – Compliance Program.
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2, ss 18, 29(1)(a), 224, 224(1)(a)(ii), 224(2), 224(3), 232, 246(2)(b), 246(2)(c) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53(a), 76, 76E(2), 76E(3), 76E(4)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Harvey Norman Holdings Limited [2011] FCA 1407 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 629 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) (2011) 282 ALR 246 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v SMS Global Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 855 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Gourmet Goody's Family Restaurant Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1216 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission and Distribution Ltd (No 2) (2002) 190 ALR 169 Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 72 Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd (2007) 158 FCR 543 Hills v Sutton [2007] FCA 2033 Wells v Locarno Management Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1034 Alfred v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2011] FCA 556 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2012] FCA 189 Fair Work Ombudsman v Tiger Telco Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 479 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) (2005) 215 ALR 301 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 19 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2010) 188 FCR 238 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kingisland Meatworks & Cellars Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 48 Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No 2) (1993) 41 FCR 89 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chen (2003) 132 FCR 309 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Goldy Motors Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1885 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Midland Brick Co Pty Ltd (2004) 207 ALR 329
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate