Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 13) [2013] FCA 577 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 13) [2013] FCA 577
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ARBN 000 312 685) AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v P. T. GARUDA INDONESIA LIMITED (ARBN 000 861 165)
File numbers: NSD 534 of 2010 NSD 955 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 12 June 2013
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Witnesses – Credibility evidence – Whether evidence of a previous representation admissible as credibility evidence – Whether a 'person' includes a corporation for the purposes of s 108A of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 2, 2C Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 101A, 103, 108A
Cases cited: State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Brown (2006) 66 NSWLR 540 cited
Date of hearing: 5 June 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: General
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
Counsel for the Applicant: J Clarke
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for Air New Zealand: N Owens, R Yezerski
Solicitor for Air New Zealand: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for Garuda: T Brennan
Solicitor for Garuda: Norton White
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 534 of 2010
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate