Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Miller v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 590 Citation: Miller v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 590
Parties: MARK GARRY MILLER v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
File number: QUD 128 of 2013
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 7 June 2013
Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – migration – application for judicial review of decision of Minister to set aside decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and cancel visa of non-citizen pursuant to s 501A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether applicant denied procedural fairness – consideration of particulars provided to the applicant by the Minister in its Notice of Intention to Consider cancellation of the applicant's visa – whether Notice afforded applicant procedural fairness in respect of the matters critical to the decision the Minister proposed to make – whether Minister failed to highlight sufficient particulars of factors relevant to what was in 'the national interest', in circumstances where the applicant's criminal record was highlighted in the Notice Held: no procedural unfairness – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501A
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 cited Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110 cited Gbojueh v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2012) 202 FCR 417 considered Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 followed Marbury v Madison (1803) 5 US 137 cited Maurangi v Bowen (2012) 200 FCR 191 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 considered Somaghi v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 31 FCR 100 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate