Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 6) [2013] FCA 591 Citation: De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 6) [2013] FCA 591
Parties: DE BRETT SEAFOOD PTY LTD (ACN 093 552 366) and J WISBEY & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 959 851) v QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901), LUFTHANSA CARGO AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD (ARBN 001 056 195), SINGAPORE AIRLINES CARGO PTE LTD (ARBN 095 934 857), CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED (ARBN 000 479 514), AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD (ARBN 000 312 685), AIR NEW ZEALAND (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 084 974 569), and BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC (ARBN 002 747 597)
File number: VID 12 of 2007
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 2 April 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applications to join additional cross-respondents – whether applications should be adjourned pending ruling on application to amend pleadings – consideration of two broadly competing submissions.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – r 15.05
Date of hearing: 2 April 2013
Date of publication of reasons: 14 June 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the First and Second Applicants: Mr M Pesman and Ms E Bennett
Solicitor for the Applicants: Maurice Blackburn
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr C Colquhoun
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Johnson Winter and Slattery
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate