Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Doolan on behalf of the Butchulla People Land and Sea Claim #2 v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 602 Citation: Doolan on behalf of the Butchulla People Land and Sea Claim #2 v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 602
Parties: KATE DOOLAN AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE BUTCHULLA PEOPLE LAND AND SEA CLAIM #2 v STATE OF QUEENSLAND AND OTHERS
File number: QUD 288 of 2009
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 19 June 2013
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – practice and procedure – show cause why respondent should not be removed as a party – ss 84(3) and 84(8) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether respondent has separate interest in land or waters that may be affected by determination of proceedings – whether respondent in fact dissentient member of applicant claim group
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 84
Cases cited: Starkey v State of South Australia (2011) 193 FCR 450 cited
Date of hearing: 13 May 2013
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms W Qalotaki of Queensland South Native Title Services
Solicitor for the State of Queensland: Mr S Grant of Crown Law
Counsel for Ms L McIntosh The Respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 288 of 2009
BETWEEN: KATE DOOLAN AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE BUTCHULLA PEOPLE LAND AND SEA CLAIM #2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate