Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shoreform (Qld) Pty Ltd v Millenium Coal Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 645 Citation: Shoreform (Qld) Pty Ltd v Millenium Coal Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 645
Parties: SHOREFORM (QLD) PTY LTD ACN 115 107 250 v MILLENIUM COAL PTY LTD ACN 089 566 021 and PEABODY AUSTRALIA MINING PTY LTD ACN 002 818 699
File number: NSD 2347 of 2011
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 3 July 2013
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – standard discovery – whether reasonable search – documents referred to in discovered documents – whether direct relevance to issues raised by the pleadings – particular discovery – evidence
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.14, 20.15 and 20.22
Cases cited: Guy Carpenter and Co Pty Ltd v Grove (No 2) [2011] FCA 1190 Procter v Kalivis (2009) 263 ALR 461
Date of hearing: 26 June 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 62
Counsel for the Applicant Mr P Barham
Solicitors for the Applicant Fraser Clancy Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents Mr N Kidd SC
Solicitors for the Respondents McCullough Robertson Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2347 of 2011
BETWEEN: SHOREFORM (QLD) PTY LTD ACN 115 107 250
Applicant
AND: MILLENIUM COAL PTY LTD ACN 089 566 021
First Respondent
PEABODY AUSTRALIA MINING PTY LTD ACN 002 818 699
Second Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 3 JULY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate