Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tomson v Minister for Finance and Deregulation [2013] FCA 664 Citation: Tomson v Minister for Finance and Deregulation [2013] FCA 664
Parties: PETER TOMSON and KIM TOMSON v MINISTER FOR FINANCE AND DEREGULATION
File number: NSD 1289 of 2012
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 11 July 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – JUDICIAL REVIEW – application by two persons for "act of grace payment" under s 33(1) of Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (Cth) after failed prosecution under Customs Act 1901 (Cth) of one of them – where new application refused by delegate – where earlier application for act of grace payment by one of those persons on different basis refused by Minister without giving reasons – whether refusal of new application improper exercise of power or exercise of discretionary power in accordance with a policy without regard to the merits of the particular case or so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have so exercised the power (ss 5(1)(e), (f) and 5(2)(g) of Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)) – where both applications by common applicant on some similar but not identical facts and circumstances – where new application expressly abandoned basis of prior rejected application – whether new application considered on its own merits or refusal decision based on prior application without regard to new information and claim by additional applicant – where delegate referred to Departmental policy that earlier decision would be reconsidered only if pertinent new evidence/facts/arguments presented – where delegate refused to reconsider new application – whether new application substantially differed from prior application Held: delegate's reasons did not reflect consideration of new application including new applicant or new information
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate