Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pei Xu v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2013] FCA 676 Citation: Pei Xu v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2013] FCA 676
Parties: PEI XU v WAN ZE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 131 642 147; KE QIN REN v WAN ZE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 131 642 147
File numbers: NSD 1339 of 2012 NSD 1341 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 10 July 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside paragraphs of subpoena to solicitors for interveners – relevance – whether oppression – whether fishing – legal professional privilege – whether waiver
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 24.15
Cases cited: Associated Dominions Assurance Society Pty Ltd v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1952) 72 WN (NSW) 250 Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Shell Co of Australia Ltd (1999) 161 ALR 686 Azzi v Volvo [2006] NSWSC 283 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice (2008) 234 CLR 275 Pei Xu v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2013] FCA 419 R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153 Wren v Mahony (1972) 126 CLR 212
Date of hearing: 8 July 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate