Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Strickland v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 677 Citation: Strickland v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 677
Parties: MARJORIE MAY STRICKLAND AND ANNE JOYCE NUDDING v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
File number(s): WAD 301 of 2010
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 3 July 2013
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – whether application should be dismissed – application to amend – whether amendment likely to lead to different outcome
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Cases cited: Velickovic v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 782
Date of hearing: 3 July 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr McIntyre
Solicitor for the Applicant: Corser & Corser Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Creewel
Solicitor for the Respondent: State Solicitor for Western Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 301 of 2010
BETWEEN: MARJORIE MAY STRICKLAND AND ANNE JOYCE NUDDING
Applicant
AND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 3 JULY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application in this matter be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 301 of 2010
BETWEEN: MARJORIE MAY STRICKLAND AND ANNE JOYCE NUDDING
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate