Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taylor v Saloniklis [2013] FCA 679 Citation: Taylor v Saloniklis [2013] FCA 679
Parties: LYNETTE SU-YIN TAYLOR & ORS v SUZANNA SALONIKLIS & ORS
File number: SAD 336 of 2012
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 10 July 2013
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.11, 20.12, 20.13, 20.14, 20.15 Fair Trading Act 1987 (SA) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth)
Date of last submissions: 27 June 2013
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr I M Neil SC and Mr P Moorhouse
Solicitor for the Applicants: Petrine Costigan Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Dr C Bleby SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: EMA Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 336 of 2012
BETWEEN: LYNETTE SU-YIN TAYLOR & ORS
First Applicant
AND: SUZANNA SALONIKLIS & ORS
First Respondent
JUDGE: BESANKO J DATE OF ORDER: 10 JULY 2013 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The parties make standard discovery to one another within 35 days. 2. The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the respondents' interlocutory application dated 20 June 2013. 3. The directions hearing be adjourned to 28 August 2013 at 9.00 am (Adelaide time). Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate