Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bahonko, in the matter of Bahonko [2013] FCA 683 Citation: Bahonko, in the matter of Bahonko [2013] FCA 683
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF STANISLAWA BAHONKO
File number: VID 650 of 2013
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 8 July 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for judicial review of an administrative decision of a Registrar of the Court – whether reviewable error established – jurisdiction of the Court to hear and determine criminal charges – abuse of process PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Recusal application – whether reasonable apprehension of bias
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - ss 34, 35, 36, 36A, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) - s 19 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) - r 2.26 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) - s 68
Date of hearing: 8 July 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: Appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 650 of 2013
IN THE MATTER OF STANISLAWA BAHONKO
Applicant
JUDGE: TRACEY J DATE OF ORDER: 8 JULY 2013 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for judicial review be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 650 of 2013
IN THE MATTER OF: STANISLAWA BAHONKO
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate