Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tsiamis v Comcare [2013] FCA 684 Citation: Tsiamis v Comcare [2013] FCA 684
Appeal from: Tsiamis and Comcare [2013] AATA 319
Parties: MARINA TINA TSIAMIS v COMCARE
File number: NSD 941 of 2013
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 10 July 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – no denial of reasonable opportunity to be heard – no question of law – appeal dismissed EVIDENCE – privilege against self-incrimination – power of Tribunal to issue a certificate
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33, 39, 44, 62 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 128 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 4
Cases cited: Brown v Repatriation Commission (1985) 7 FCR 302 Dolan v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1993) 42 FCR 206 Drake v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409 Elbayeh v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2012] FCA 832 Griffin v Pantzer [2004] FCAFC 113, 137 FCR 209 Re Hourani v Tax Practitioners Board [2012] AATA 518, 58 AAR 104 Re Tsiamis and Comcare [2013] AATA 319 Wecker v Secretary, Department of Education, Science and Training [2008] FCAFC 108, 168 FCR 272
Date of hearing: 10 July 2013
Date of last submissions: 10 July 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate