Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
De Rose v State of South Australia [2013] FCA 687 Citation: De Rose v State of South Australia [2013] FCA 687
Parties: PETER DE ROSE and TJARUWA ANDERSON v THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, LYNDAVALE PTY LTD, TIANDA RESOURCES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD, TIANDA URANIUM (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD and TIEYON PASTORAL CO PTY LTD
File number: SAD 208 of 2010
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 16 July 2013
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – consideration of role of Court – consideration of s 87 of Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – resolution by agreement of claim for determination of native title
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 87, 223, 225
Cases cited: Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 cited Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 cited Gunggari People v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 cited Smith v Western Australia (2000) 104 FCR 494 cited Nelson v Northern Territory (2010) 190 FCR 344 cited Lander v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 427 cited Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422 cited Risk v Northern Territory [2006] FCA 404 cited Western Australia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1 cited De Rose v South Australia (No 2) (2005) 145 FCR 290 discussed De Rose v South Australia (2003) 133 FCR 325 discussed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate