Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd v Generic Health Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] FCA 689 Citation: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd v Generic Health Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] FCA 689
Parties: OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY v GENERIC HEALTH PTY LTD
File number: NSD 121 of 2012
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 12 July 2013
Date of hearing: 12 July 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr P Kerr of Allens
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Ryan SC with Mr A Fox
Solicitor for the Respondent: K&L Gates
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 121 of 2012
BETWEEN: OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD
First Applicant
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Second Applicant
AND: GENERIC HEALTH PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 12 JULY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The period of time within which the respondent can file affidavit evidence in answer to the affidavit of Jonathon Phillips filed on 13 June 2013 be extended to 11 September 2013. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 121 of 2012
BETWEEN: OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD
First Applicant
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Second Applicant
AND: GENERIC HEALTH PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: YATES J DATE: 12 JULY 2013 PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate