Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Robinson, in the matter of ACN 069 895 585 Pty Ltd (formerly known as Waterman Collections Pty Ltd) (in liq) [2013] FCA 706 Citation: Robinson, in the matter of ACN 069 895 585 Pty Ltd (formerly known as Waterman Collections Pty Ltd) (in liq) [2013] FCA 706
Parties: MARK JULIAN ROBINSON (AS LIQUIDATOR OF ACN 069 895 585 PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WATERMAN COLLECTIONS PTY LTD) (IN LIQ)) v ACN 069 895 585 PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WATERMAN COLLECTIONS PTY LTD) (IN LIQ) and INSURANCE AUSTRALIA LTD
File number: VID 509 of 2013
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2013
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 18 July 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Russell Kennedy Solicitors
Solicitor for the Second Defendant: William Roberts Fricke
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 509 of 2013
IN THE MATTER OF ACN 069 895 585 PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WATERMAN COLLECTIONS PTY LTD) (IN LIQUIDATION) BETWEEN: MARK JULIAN ROBINSON (AS LIQUIDATOR OF ACN 069 895 585 PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WATERMAN COLLECTIONS PTY LTD) (IN LIQ))
Plaintiff
AND: ACN 069 895 585 PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WATERMAN COLLECTIONS PTY LTD) (IN LIQ)
First Defendant
INSURANCE AUSTRALIA LTD
Second Defendant
JUDGE: GORDON J DATE OF ORDER: 19 JULY 2013 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to s 564 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act), the property of the First Defendant be distributed in the following order of priority: 1.1 $240,542 to the Second Defendant; 1.2 in payment of claims under s 556(1) of the Act which remained unsatisfied; 1.3 $600,000 to the Second Defendant; 1.4 the balance, if any, to other unsecured creditors pari passu. 2. A copy of these orders be served forthwith on the known creditors of the First Defendant. 3. These orders not be entered before 9 August 2013. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate